Most Prop Firms Are Designed to Fail You

Hit your profit target? Great. Now here's a consistency rule you didn't see coming. News restriction during NFP. Trailing drawdown that follows you like a shadow. Payout "processing" for weeks.

Lark Funding is built differently.

7% static drawdown—the most forgiving in the industry. Base Monthly Reward up to $1,000 even when you're losing. One evaluation phase. Zero consistency rules. Zero news restrictions. Zero hidden gotchas.

Request your payout and keep trading. No account lock. No "processing delays."

We've been paying traders consistently for 3+ years. Not 3 months. If we were running a challenge mill, we'd be bankrupt by now.

→ larkfunding.com

🎬 Warner Bros Just Rejected Paramount—Because Apparently Netflix Is the Better Ex

In the latest episode of "Hollywood Can't Figure Out Streaming," Warner Bros is planning to reject Paramount's takeover offer in favor of sticking with their existing Netflix deal.

Translation?

Paramount walked up with roses, a ring, and a business proposal—and Warner Bros said "thanks but we're already seeing someone who actually has money."

📺 What Actually Happened

Paramount's Pitch: Paramount came to Warner Bros with a buyout offer that would've created a mega-media conglomerate. On paper, it sounds great—combine libraries, streaming platforms, production capabilities, and theoretically dominate the entertainment landscape.

Warner Bros' Response: "Nah, we're good."

Why? Because Warner Bros already has a lucrative agreement with Netflix that they view as offering:

• Greater value (read: more money)

• Greater certainty (read: Netflix isn't drowning in debt)

• Better terms (read: Netflix isn't demanding we merge our dying cable networks)

The real kicker? This isn't about romance or brand loyalty. This is about cold, hard cash flow—and Netflix has it while Paramount... doesn't.

💰 Why Warner Bros Is Playing Hard to Get

Let's break down why Warner Bros looked at Paramount's offer and essentially said "it's not you, it's absolutely you."

The Netflix Safety Net:

Warner Bros has been licensing content to Netflix while simultaneously trying to build their own streaming platform (Max, formerly HBO Max, formerly... you know what, it doesn't matter). The Netflix deal is pure profit with zero risk:

• Netflix pays top dollar for content

• Warner Bros keeps ownership and control

• No integration headaches

• No balance sheet drama

• Cash hits the account, everyone's happy

The Paramount Problem:

Paramount's offer looks attractive until you actually read the fine print and realize you're not acquiring a thriving media empire—you're inheriting:

• Massive debt (because who doesn't love leveraged buyouts?)

• Declining cable networks (remember when people paid for cable? Yeah, nobody else does either)

• A streaming service (Paramount+) that's bleeding money faster than a prop trader's first week

• "Synergies" that only exist in PowerPoint presentations and CEO fever dreams

Warner Bros did the math and realized: "We could merge with Paramount, take on billions in debt, integrate dying assets, and MAYBE create value in 5-7 years… OR we could just keep cashing Netflix checks and sleep soundly at night."

Guess which option won?

🎭 The Bigger Hollywood Disaster: Streaming Wars Are Eating Everyone

This rejection isn't just corporate drama—it's a symptom of a much bigger problem: the streaming wars destroyed profitability and nobody knows how to fix it.

The Old Model (That Worked):

• Make content

• License it to cable networks and international distributors

• Print money

• Repeat

The New Model (That Doesn't):

• Spend billions making content for your own streaming platform

• Charge customers $15/month

• Realize $15/month doesn't cover the cost of making content

• Raise prices

• Customers cancel

• Panic and make more content nobody watches

• Repeat until bankruptcy

Warner Bros looked at Paramount and saw a company speedrunning this disaster. Paramount+ is burning cash. Their cable networks are dying. Their film studio is inconsistent at best.

Meanwhile, Netflix is the only streaming company that actually makes money—so why would Warner Bros ditch the profitable relationship to marry Paramount's problems?

📊 What This Means for Markets

Media Consolidation Just Flatlined:

Remember when everyone predicted media companies would merge into 3-4 mega-conglomerates dominating streaming? That fantasy just got rejected harder than Paramount's acquisition offer. Turns out nobody wants to acquire someone else's debt and dying assets just to "own more content." Shocking.

Netflix Keeps Winning By Default:

Every rejected merger reinforces that Netflix won the streaming wars. They're the only profitable platform, they're licensing content instead of bleeding cash to produce it, and they're watching competitors self-destruct from a comfortable distance. It's like watching a marathon where everyone else keeps tripping over their own shoelaces.

The Precedent That Changes Everything:

If Warner Bros—also struggling with streaming—looked at Paramount and said "no thanks," what does that tell you about Paramount's balance sheet? This sets the tone: healthy companies won't merge with sinking ships when they can just license to Netflix and avoid the integration nightmare. Expect more deals to collapse as executives realize consolidation doesn't fix broken business models—it just creates bigger dumpster fires.

🎯 The Munch Take

Netflix is up 7% YTD, which sounds fine until you zoom out and realize it's down over 20% in the last six months. All this recent news about Warner Bros dodging disasters and traditional media imploding should theoretically be rocket fuel for Netflix. Instead, the stock's stuck in neutral, unable to find footing despite being the clear winner in the streaming wars.

The 5-year chart? Solid. We're looking at a decent pullback from highs, which usually gets our attention. But here's the thing: we're not buying. Yet.

Why we're hesitant:

Netflix is making all the right moves operationally—licensing content, staying profitable, watching competitors self-destruct—but the stock's acting like it's got commitment issues. When the fundamentals scream "buy" but price action says "meh," we pay attention to price action.

We've got our eyes on other plays right now that are showing better momentum and clearer entry points. But Netflix is absolutely on our watchlist. If this pullback continues and we get a cleaner technical setup, it could be a layup.

Question for you: Are you buying Netflix at these levels? Hit reply and let us know—we're curious if we're missing something or if everyone else is also sitting on their hands waiting for a better entry.

— Pip Munch

Share Pip Munch

Chances are you have some trading friends. Why don’t you be a pal, share Pip Munch and earn some goodies for it?

You currently have 0 referrals, only 1 away from receiving The Trading Plan That Helped Me Pass 4 $100,000 FTMO Challenges.

Or copy and paste this link to others: https://pipmunch.com/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER